Metropolis in negative
The most absurd view any political group can have at this time is racism: the belief that groups can be measured in terms of racial or genetic history of evolutionary progress, terms. It affects the sensibility of equality among all peoples, but it also goes against the "individualism" that is at the core of our convenience-based, democratic, egalitarian society.
No two people are equal in any way, and no group is equal to any other. Each has developed differently and from different sources, and there is no way to make these groups equal except by standardizing them to a lowest common denominator, such as liking fatty, sugary foods and being immobile in front of televisions. To prevent globalism, the single most important weapon possible is globalism, in which one's ethnicity, culture and history become reasons for staying unique in a world of conformists. So far, no race has disclaimed racism without promptly committing genetic and cultural suicide.
currently benefits to the social, industrial and political infrastructure which profit from humankind's lack of direction. Consequently, evolution is demonized, despite its inherent tendency to focus more on realistic goals than the fear of negativity that generates mass hysteria, ignorance and ineptitude and, consequently, corporate logic
In our history modern government is combined of social, industrial and religious influences which developed among those who could not succeed in the first centralized societies, which designed competing autocracies. Political atmosphere produces dissidents who design the system opposition to an individual, replacing collective values with political mass appeal known as religion. With the advent of technology, the industrial revolution converted societies into national states which regulated profit activity, forming the basis for international trading and politics. Societies in which individuals are guaranteed evolutionary success for excellence thrived, in turn shaping the populations within them.
Although having succeeded technologically, we have failed to maintain a society based on values, or which respects our environment, preferring instead an atmosphere of conformity, consumer consciousness and what is a safe lack of conflict. The result is stupefying social taboo and an inability to conceive and execute long-term plans.
A desensitized and dystopian society does not agree on common goals, and individuals worry about their own convenience only. Consequently the responsibility falls on its leaders, who are busy seeking profit. This causes massive environmental damage, social decay, and a fundamental boredom and misery inhibit daily tasks. Further, society seems to be self-consuming.
Considering the needs of society as a whole eliminating the short-sightedness and wasted time spent pursuing irrelevant goals, allowing the individual to first fulfill his or her obligations to the state and secondarily to possibly tangential needs shows people as we are, a part of a much larger system. This appreciation in turn leads to respect for the natural world as it exists and for behaviors that are more "natural" in their appreciation of structure and context.
Within this new worldview would be a corrosion of conformity, in which there are few radicals and terrorists with malicious intentions, therefore no expectation of "fairness" from nature. The function of nature would be understood and described, and mythologized appropriately for popular understanding.
Within each race there should be tolerance for all range of intellectual activity, so long as it is experimental and does not attempt to work as a virus upon the population as a whole.
Between generations, learning is passed on in tradition, and it is this accumulated
Tradition shapes cultural and social expectations in the character of people by their actions and the values they prioritize. Society is more important than stated system of government, current philosophical models or sentiment of the press, and momentary influences like favorite authors, actors or politicians. Its cultural origins predate existence on earth
Traditional values are the cultural focus of a civilization as part of order or absolute power. If the civilization has multiple cultures within it, these should be seen as separated to avoid forming their divergent values and producing a synthetic hybrid. Further, traditions should not be censored by the convenient opinions of the time, but should be considered as having proven their own value over many repeated tests.
In retrospect one may infer that this is a series of choices made from options facilitated by an external political/economic atmosphere, in a healthier future view perhaps the individual can be seen as someone taming the experience of life itself, not its conclusions or monetary symbolizations. The heroic stature of our ancestors, if resurrected in a cultural capacity, will give individuals the stimulus/incentive to do what they must do to be satisfied: create a frontier and conquer it.
This eliminates a dependence on social approval ("hero worship") and downplays the influence of social prestige, money and novelty in one's life; outside of the simple functions of maintaining survival and aiding the community incrementally. We are compelled by tradition to seek a worthy accomplishment for our lives. For many this includes the everyday tasks of having families, businesses, and friends.
I refer to ethical standards of my kind, not restrictive or constraint-based rule sets, but ones which requires innovation and motivation which is not inspired by any specific stimulus, but the vast experience of life itself. The student is removed from a position where he or she can come to bad choices, and select reasonable compromises, and is placed into a situation where a choice must be conceived, designed and executed in order to be made.
Despite this seeming daunting to someone, it is derived from an essential principle of life and evolution itself, which is competition between that which is functional and that which is less than exemplary. When there are no longer easy socially-approved ways to compete in which the rewards confirm evolutionary success, the individual is forced to discover meaning or be content with an awareness of his or her role as a supporting event.
The lack of focus on educational depth, objectivity and flexibility has made democracy and other nation's places of the obedient, demoralized and voters. Having no critical skills, this average person is overwhelmed when facing political questions or a massive media establishment using immoral sentiment to sway them in convenient directions. In any system of government this person is at a disadvantage, and by participating in any fashion puts his or her civilization at a disadvantage.
Any society that makes education and intelligence priorities for their consideration of success, by the genetic process of that mode of value, begins refining its population to be more intelligent. Societies that do this for thousands of years produce individuals of high intelligence. There are two parts to physical aptitude: raw ability and the shaping of it to produce intentional talent.
It is unwise to allow those who are potentially your enemies to broadcast constant propaganda into the minds of your citizens. Since commerce has no mentality, it should not dominate the airwaves and publications; therefore, in any new society which will last, the media will succumb to at least partial control by cultural factors. While media establishments have been working to break this down for years as it exists from tradition, they have been motivated solely by financial gain and thus are unlikely to promote anything as a long-term idea except that which creates for them more of an audience.
There are two issues with financial gain. First, having such as the ideological highest value of a civilization is insane; this however is the case with both capitalism and socialism, which make some regulation of money the fulcrum of goals in their civilization. This prioritization creates unregulated self-interest which amounts to philosophically-justified theft.
Second, there is the question of the monetary base of an economy, and how to estimate the value of that economy to show the amount of worth the system can support. In this kind of foundation, there are two different choices: material-backed finance (supply) or devious economic underwriting (demand). The latter functions only because we believe it to do so, and that the former is inappropriate for the size of a global economy, supporting an economic monetary basis calculated from the total value added to raw materials or services in their processing by the economy.
Those who held beliefs which were openly against the state, such as those of prisoners, would be sent to the appropriate location for which their beliefs would be desired. If we're cleared of criminal belief, societies could rebuild according to their traditional values, provided that they could resurrect enough of their strength to have it compete with others.
In this same mental frame, many people who are of a useless or criminal mindset will be ejected from the population. We don't care whether or not they're innocent of one specific crime, but recognize a pattern of criminality or worthlessness and would like it to occur elsewhere.
All decision making in government, education, law and science will be made on the assumption of materialism for our people, and there is no duality in which things are purer, in our survival. Until the point in time where we can objectively look into a dualistic space and determine natural laws for its operation, any accusation about it is superstition and carries the dangers of that faculty, namely the attribution of any arbitrary or profiteering actions to the will of an idealistic race.
The rampant destruction of our natural environment must be reversed and a future equilibrium between humans and nature must be found. To be specific, environmental destruction is all of the following:
1. Alteration of natural resources (water, air, soil, space) with chemicals or material patterns not found in these areas in their natural state.
2. Destruction of animal populations, including genocide and habitat destruction of those species to promote the stronger and demote the weaker.
3. Over colonization and overconsumption of space on our planet, thereby excluding many species from the ecological niche they need to live, interact and breed.
4. Abandonment of trash, equipment, buildings and vehicles across the planet's surface and the production of massive landfills in which mixed, non-recycled trash and equipment decay, leaking pollutants into the surrounding environment.
Technology is to be used sensibly. Capitalism produces a convenience culture that distributes technology too broadly and too frequent to be useful; underdeveloped recycling, waste containment and RF pollution causes dangers to enter the environment. Technology also facilitates overpopulation and an extension of the lives of those who are useless, thus causing further land and resource consumption unnecessarily. Technology should be used as a tool, and not assumed as natural part of life.