Graffiti Complex

[This took an... hour to write... must press... publish... button...]
m.j.banks

So there's this bullshit called "net neutrality" and I've already written about it and okay so whatever call it that eventho it's not a network and isn't neutral, you're doing something, trees do something, I'm not mad at trees, I'm not mad at you.

However.

For years there's a saying "in capitalism bread waits for you to buy it, in socialism, you wait to buy bread, and there's no fucking bread, because nobody's making any bread because a law that says there should be magical bread doesn't actually make any" I think is the actual quote, or it is now. This is #literally, the #actual problem in Venezuela, in your world.

There's this idea going around that capitalism somehow also means monopoly and I don't fear that because there are mobs of angry idiots that have gathered and collected a monopoly government of their own, and sometimes there are protesters now that you mention it, and the hypocrisy waits like a loaded gun, but let's put another metaphorical bullet in it.

If you live in a country without guns, you don't live in a country without guns, btw.

Thereof, those groups of people represent a free and open internet citizenship, whose use of a private company's services are the verifiable capitalism unadulterated, you adulterers of innocence itself, the very same allowing me to blog this, which is a society that protects collective bargaining, and in a truly free and open internet, the way an employee union can cripple a company from within, the people can change how the internet is delivered.

I'm not familiar with how unfair the internet is in your minds, the prevalence of any protest is for surplus of presumed accessibility, more of what's hidden, and yet nobody complains about the actual speed of the network, which can be improved by quality of hardware, funded by a capitalist society, (sorry, Cuba, you still kinda suck) by means of profit margins, and even in the island dungeon near Florida, they've censorship, not in anyway neutrality, where if i'm making the case for a utopia they perpetually destroy by not understanding the mathematical ADDITION principle, they allow growth.

I assume they think Usa is a place with technology stolen from crashed extraterrestrial time travelers of the future. Fuck you, Cuba, get a clue.

The response will be to find a theoretical hole, and jump thru it, but I can tell you this: The internet is not a technological singularity where a technocrat in a mid-level bureaucratically-funded gov't job can will away problems that don't exist. As much as you want to run that simulation again in your head, it's a waste of energy without all the variables. You can be prepared to be upset about everything, you still won't have spent a few hours at two in the morning writing a blog about net neutrality.

I've even gone as far as propose that communism, doesn't even exist. I could ask - by the way, anything existing is preposterous - you if it does or if you've ever seen it. You hear about it all the time, you talk about it, others talk about it, you've read about it, you can research it, you can even practice it, but maybe you haven't.

There mightn't be any way to know.

If a taxable (vomit) product is bad, it fails as a product, or someone improves it, but the company has to provide quality or suffer consequences. Capitalism is the largest risk pool in healthcare, but people stopped looking at the bill and started looking at the bullshit. That collective of negotiators is only 'once-removed' by representative gov't, but can negotiate nevertheless.

Circle peg, three dimensional cube in theoretical space.

Not getting the results your apolitical bias prefers is a matter of switching search engines and/or their algorithms bypassing the filters designed to see queries, AND, their answers passing over ISP lines to see if they were fair, with "fair" being defined by a) a human, b) infinitesimal lexical combinations, and c) temporary societal norms not relegated to amalgamate political climate but somehow defined despite that, opinions change.

The larger boundary is also weird, because of complexity, censorship countries rely on keyword filtering, to remove bad content, to push political misnomers, etc, all made possible by the - wait for it - .... free and open internet, so that if you're going to shitpost, the internet wraiths can find it and devour your soul. (Halloween was last week or something.)

Universal basic income, more basic than universal, you're still going to need physical blockchain counterparts, if not merely the ledger for every grain of sand - that's a long story - anyway it's a perfect model for industrialization for those of you that don't understand capitalism, the shifting solution of another world halfway behind us, a third world in shouting distance, while half of the new world doesn't watch tv on any given night of the week, and capitalism works so well we didn't even have to adopt the metric system, ratio 1:all, you know, the system the rest of the planet uses even on those islands nobody goes to and the inhabitants are one family for generations, my metaphor of earth.

By the time blockchain is taught in grade (primary) school, we'll be two planets. Content filtering doesn't increase customer appreciation, your games and shows still stream, your websites still load, a neutral intersection is empty or jammed, premium services can be better or ultimately are abandoned, there are show about it called 'remember the last decade' and nobody remembers them, one day Cuba is going to be a Usa state, and nobody is going to remember when it wasn't. Toll roads are paved, bank parking lots are smooth, if you want a gov't run internet, go to your computer and log into one, oh wait, you can't, there's only the private sector lines.

Gov't does it's job, or it doesn't, and i just realized the entire thing might be a red herring and I've prolly spent 20 minutes writing a piece of shit.

Well fuckety doodah, aren't I a witch's tit. Let's look at quotes for a while and publish this.

From people who preach socialism but don't allow it, neutrality by getting in your way. Okay, let's find a good quote. Maybe something about cookies, people love cookies.

And why do ppl think socialism develops the soul? Is not the case for morality possibility of risk and not the promise of safety?

It's a political ecosystem, don't be a parasite. Punishment teaches subservience, not the ethical output of cooperative survival. That's some sort of emotionless recidivism.

“To go wrong in one's own way is better than to go right in someone else's.” ― Fyodor Dostoyevsky, Crime and Punishment

-

Metanoia

(Declarations)
An atavistic or deterministic nature, by culture, creature, or creativity, but there is still ability to do today with what yesterday has given.

(Main)
Regressive, a return to a previous position. In a sense of this word, it could be a leftist point of fact that is repeated, a single point of regression. In another sense of this word, it would seem, it could be a rightist point of view that is returned-to, a single characteristic of regression.

Transgressive, a dissociative position. In so much a libertarian as much as a law. A double sense of the word, in that a libertarian would require detachment from a law, just as much as a law would be unable to serve any purpose. An opinion that an expression of liberty is suitable insomuch that it cannot be imposed, and an observation that a law cannot provide liberty unless it is imposed everywhere it is not applicable. Renaissance, creativity with available resources recreating a perceived scenario or environment. A ruleset to be free of a government by creating a government, a government of rules to be free of rules. That which floats on the water transgresses the waves, and the water floats across the surface and holds much downward.

Progressive, a return to a new position. In escape, progress is made by distance, in return progress is made by goal, but not neither all escape nor all returns are progress. Aside from mistakes of decision, progress is marred by simultaneous definitions, of movement and success. It is an equivocation to combine the corollary, there are steps and there are measures. Mortality makes progress toward eternal truth, but during which one can progress toward error, or to success or failure at varying speeds, toward a fatal flaw or passed a success.

Aggressive, the obvious yet still to be such a struggle to describe enlightenment to the new world. Progress as a regression, regress as a progression, these things transgress around us and never us around these things. If the past consumes us a bitter taste follows, if the future consumes us let not today be full of bitter things.

Digressive, reverse manifestations, far fetched and dilettantish, a distancing view of something while subtly retreating, walking backwards and looking forward, disposing accounts of the origin including the distance, allowing the changing landscape to replace the origin, confusing movement for location. Visually, an linear equation that replaces a fixed point with a unidirectional ray with a variable that represents only one or the other without geometric nonlinear boundary conditions (as a nonlinear expression). You are living in reality's mental equivalent.

/mjbanks