Time-Delayed Release

"It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong." ~ Thomas Sowell

It's early January 2018, this is my first entry of the year, and you're reading it whenever and I'm sorry about that, but to give myself some leeway from repercussions I've waited until now. I don't typically write about things just because things happen as sensationalism is never as sensual as emphatic fanatics would have you believe. Also, the powers get to read this and that's going to be a small adjustment that is analogous to selfless righteousness, a power that is not only unique to a very rare and exact condition, but is too much for anyone to control, and I have my doubts about it sometimes myself regarding my sanity. You would know better than I would.

Well then.

The liberal I know is sort of a scam, if and when their plans fall to waste  they become embroiled in generalizations and bitter rejection of responsibility. In these later years, I've learned that I've never disagreed with them more. More than ever. They're a liberal, and to make this about me, I always had my druthers to disagree vs that person on a moral level, as to find inner peace, who'd always set me on edge with loose interpretations and indifference to emotion, which my persona of misinterpretations and blindness to any casual emotive, combined with an artificial intelligence of physical expression, was at an arm's length from real communication in the textbook sense. To rephrase, I wouldn't have chosen to question over learning from anyone in their position, and still somehow learned top down skills to communicate with liberals, not people.

Now that's a proper insult, but let's look further.

In part, the liberal agenda is at odds with a conservative agenda, skip to the next paragraph to see what I mean. This reads like any other bullshit about liberals as time has told without straying. Many lessons of liberalism, to be accepting, to be unique, to be creative, to be successful, but it is all a blur, or a scarred photo of these things when one liberal atrocity outweighs all the good intentions, full and up. I often demand people recognize that liberalism is a youthful approach, but as others describe it as naivete, it kind of fits a metaphor, liberalism is like opening your eyes in bed, you still have to get out of bed and be a productive member of society, but the liberal chooses to procrastinate by all measures. Mostly I've seen that calls for acceptance are really stage decoration so that whatever shitshow they produce you've been coerced into watching it to the end. The liberal in question once tried to exploit a tax break on a property, and when it fell thru told me along the wording 'She's a woman, you know, they're all women,' which I don't know how bad that is and prolly never will, but that's where that liberal's mind went, it was somebody else's fault just so they could sleep at night.

Where conservatism is psychopathy fading into eventual morality, liberalism is a frantic sociopathy that's very in-the-moment, but not a moment grounded in reality. For the record, and historically, one who is conservative hopes to preserve order of the known world, whereas one who is liberal hopes to preserve the future of the possible imagination, not only are these at odds with each other, they are point-specific views based in absolutism or absolute-logic, vulnerable to themselves.

Cathartic plagiarism, idealist fanaticism, counter culturalists, these are just words.

There was a talk of fake news, I shine a flashlight/torch in your eyes at night, you cannot see forward, you cannot see peripherally (sides), but the light is for me to see, clickbait is just a way to see what's in the cave of this new generation where asking a question can be inconsiderate to people who the technological singularity search engine deep within the earth, cooled by the mountains and space, answers all. Obviously, don't stare at the flashlight, or screen, all the bloody time, you're in a cave of ignorance, it's best to keep your wits about you, not backwards-mac-backwardly. In advertisement window space, your cookie list shares lite conversation with marketing programs, where you've been creates what you see, as if a book that writes itself as you read it, the first chapter and your imagination are all that's stopping the ending from being the second-to-last chapter in a horror story for the next library visitor that borrows your book of blank pages. Lending the thought that so many impossibilities, as a compulsive writer, I'm having trouble ending even this sentence. I'll be right back, I must meditate/pray/commune/chill/foresee.

I, myself, am writing to postpone my daily responsibilities, like content-creators and curators-of-quality, likewise, in part destruction, in part creation, in part consumption, there are examples of this already.

So I don't think there's such a thing as fake news, just talking heads reading random phrases from a word generator found by a search engine that shows you what you wanted to see in the first place. In the invention of constructive critisicm in the form of objective verification, the matter is subjective, to the subject as chosen, from the eyes of someone who chose it. With each step, multiplicity. So that you scream at your computer screens with a rage to wake the dead. There's no real substance to information. As many have said, proven, and repeated. Putting martial law at the bottom of the list, it's just too bad that it inspires so much murder and chaos.

Some more liberalism traits, in worrying about the chaos of a world of individualism they seek to control everything, as a personality type thru-out time, I've seen that to them diversity refers only to diversity-of-body, not of thought. In a double standard, disagreeing with diversity as defined by conformity of different faces, is defiance to liberal nature, which wants blue skies on a rainy day, can blame anyone at anytime, and in varying degrees blame and punish the innocent. In conservatism, the same thing. These are just words, it's all just clever wording.

My favorite part. This next part, if you disagree with me, you'll be wrong, and I'm writing my side of the debate, and giving you until the end of time to do the opposition research, so that you won't be wrong and whatever that means to you, before you read the next sentence, but you'll still be wrong.

I hope you're ready.

I warned you. Don't say I didn't.

The immigration debate (I live in U.S. #usa) is a fine example of liberalism at its nucking futtiest. Two wrongs don't make a right, and there are at least three wrongs going-on here. Liberals have convinced conservatives to deport illegal immigrants. In a sentence of proper defining, if "immigrant" is the verb, and they are trespassing, then the adverb is "illegal," and terms like "undocumented" and "dreamer" are superficial. The entire ploy of this entry is that planners are better than dreamers, if you can't tell.

So then.

Discouraging the strong, or the smart, and above all, the moral, from entry is a sad state of modern geopolitics. Oh? You're confused on how it's the liberals' fault? Let me explain it, jeez.

A democrat is someone who practices democracy, so that excludes liberals, and a republican is anyone who lives in a republic, thus everyone is a republican, but having muddled these terms opens the doorway to the first error, anarchy. Next, priorities have been muddled in that the country has social benefit programs, the importance of them its own debate, this society has chosen presently to keep them, which means someone here to use those programs in lieu of citizens is bad thinking. The counterpoint is often stated as that there is 'enuf money for something so trivial' because the common assumption is that 'there must be because i want it to happen,' leading to the second error, ignorance. If $ wasn't an issue, you'd have a flying carpet by now. Wow, déjà vu much? If liberals new anything about economics, they'd be conservatives. At least that's the saying.

Break.

My confusion is limited to the defined reality, those worried about credibility now when they weren't up-to-and-including-now is like asking for an umbrella in a boat because water is wet. Not making sense is its own magic I suppose. Parlance, the word was parlance. Or that on immigration the capitalists of one country agree with the communists of another, but the reverse is also true while the stated goals are pure opposites, immigration and programs, station and statement, rank and file. They're not coming from countries with amnesty and they're not bringing amnesty-for-others to the table, it even contradicts itself. If only I could've predicted everything ever.

Big plate.

Conservatives aren't all that much better, in the mirror universe I hate them in place of liberals because the cycle of violence is just that, it takes a village to raid another village, so i stay out of liberal cities and conservative dens. Enuf about me, how about ancient Rome, very patriarchy, much castes. That's bad, but honestly, they did have levels of involvement. Non citizens can't vote, new citizens had rights but couldn't vote, and citizens could vote. Criminals couldn't vote, were the law to change, none sentenced before the liberty to vote given, could vote, because that was the law before they got here. There's that shitty part where the last president made a promise and promises have to be kept, but if I were Caesar I wouldn't let you vote, on what pagan parallel world would that benefit anyone, so long as there's the possibility that they could open the very gates of hell, this is madness.

Okay, i have to go to the gym (#cough i'm bragging), so let's wrap this up and put a quote at the top and the bottom, then let you carve-up this post for, let's say, awhile. As far as the news goes it's all fake, i just don't think the message is intentional because they're without any real purpose in life other than greed, praising creativity and then trying to escape illicit behavior by saying "i'm just being creative" is a mean dog on a thin string, and the immigration debate is shit because the programs to be had/exploited are what legal-immigration advocates are protecting that wouldn't draw people here if those programs didn't exist and would drive liberals insane until those programs newly existed, but that's not true because there will always be people who want to come here because their places of origin are shitholes.

My theory is that those shitholes come into existence because a person feels oppressed when they are not, said person comes into power, and oppresses the fictional enemies, in a lifelong journey of clueless whatthefuckness.

"QongDaqDaq Qotbe' tlhInganpu'." (Klingons do not lie in bed.) 

Coliseum Hippocratica

It's easy to say you can have all the boxes in the warehouse when there are no boxes in the warehouse.

I gave all the boxes to people who needed them, and I'll buy new boxes with the money from the people who don't need boxes, but right now everyone needs boxes, so this isn't going to work. Historically, this has never worked, the word never, ever, so let's try something else.

I put a doctor in every box and everyone gets a box with a doctor in it. Instead of having medical savings accounts, and until we do, I'm going to give away boxes to the people that need them, but the boxes will be cost effective, insomuch, small package boxes and the doctors that ascribe to fitting in tiny boxes will have to learn to fit into those boxes and not charge extra.

The doctors cannot ask for extra boxes, albeit we don't know where the boxes originate yet, they are in high demand, because where there are medical boxes there are doctors that will want to help you with your government box.

I can't believe it, two thousand years on my calendar, and i have the smallest calendar in the calendar box, and this was waiting for me to open it. We were having a lot of fun.

There will be no murder boxes, i would like to let you worry about your box, and i promise to think about your box as much as possible, I'm definitely not going to pay for your murder box.

We're still in charge of the magic portal boxes. There are different boxes for different tasks. If you cannot afford a box, one will be provided for you. Portal reference. Continue testing.

If you should buy your own boxes that would be good, and as an added incentive, if your box has a doctor in it, we'll pay you back. This is known as warehouse insurance, which dutifully prevents unconscious objection to productivity. When I reimburse you for buying the doctor box, i will buy the doctor back, but I won't be paying the doctor for things he didn't do, and shan't be paying the tiny doctor more than he's worth. (more on productivity some other time)

You can buy box insurance, but that will only be for the promise of a box and not an actual box with a doctor inside of it, and if you stop buying the box insurance it isn't a savings accounts, so overall seems like a bad idea to me.

If you live in one place, and you want to buy an insurance box from another place, that must be allowed, invisible commerce lines are stupid.

I will not be making you buy a box, box insurance, gov't insurance, or anything else. It's supposed to be about free will and evolution. The money saved on perpetual cost curves, and initial costs, can be redirected toward savings accounts via state coffers, and by that i mean a medical savings account program, and this plan maintains functionality by society's general preference to be alive.

People want to have the best boxes, but sometimes they need my boxes, others want to buy their own boxes, it would be stupid not to let them because it is less appealing and the natural precursor to medical savings accounts - both of them will be better than an imaginary box with an imaginary price.

A small portion of those accounts could have a stock-market value, or they couldn't, i don't really know more than i wouldn't bet the whole warehouse. I wasn't thinking about school boxes, but I'm willing to answer any questions.

Legal Disclaimer: Communist countries don't prevent capitalists from buying plain boxes, but some of those countries legislatively reserve the ability to prevent (true/private) [#discuss] ownership of plain boxes. Check with your local authorities to obey local laws, and if you can't buy a box get new authorities.

...and that's how you make healthcare affordable...

/

Misappropriated Requisition

A political cartoon, a warrior of the times guarding the chalk outline where someone once rested, holding a sign that reads "private property".

I had no choice to respond to this with equal force, to imagine things the right way instead of the errors of reality, or simulation of imagination.

There are all the dreams of humanity, the combinations of obligations, facetiousness, and consideration, all of which are subject to a reigning future.

While the admittance to powerlessness, a river of raindrops and temporary peace, despite opportunity to forget there are some who remember to persevere, into independence, into complicity.

To error is the way of forgetfulness, comparative to crimes of the self, that is to say that we cannot be contrived, but in the manner one endangered animal in a specialized refuge can, for perhaps, become fifty-thousand apex animals, which new arrangements much be made, how wonderful this thought is that entire planets, if not entire galaxies, could be creations in order to let humanity do what it finds natural.

That someone could think that space guarded by the living is not theirs is not inaction, it is activity to avoid a bad feeling, to change for but the sake.

I fear it is a sick many of minds that release the dead like captured pieces no longer exploitable, this is true in unnecessary detested plagues, these are the trivialities of the manipulated truths.

The creationist makes their creations, and the revolutionists continue to misunderstand, without cause to learn the truth of the momentum, which one can block if possible as many can if available it seems, but not understanding ownership a delusion acts in their stead.

If is not property, how can it be taken; if believed that property is wrong, then how are amenities confiscated under confiscation; if property is communal, how is a political body a requirement?

There are clear mistakes alongside trepidation of leadership, those that sign themselves to service and those that assign themselves to charity, these are the many things that fight to control a line that isn't there.

The dependency on dependents, a state requires people that require a state, a redundancy of speculation surrounded by its own gravity, a people require certainties, where the universe does not cease outside of the vacuum.

I cannot follow if I cannot lead, screaming for a challenger, were I to take league with weakness I would make agency of theft, not stronger than the meek, not weaker than my false desires, and soon to insanity I could redirect what I cannot see nor imagine while being blind to the world.

To more the merrier whom can make peace like the sunlight, to surety that less have contributed more than others, while sounding as the fray are oft to do, which hidden in their individualism as a collectivist, find it hard to allow property if they themselves are not property of a collective.

It is not a collective because we begin at different moments in time, as often a pool of blood spills from a single wound, humanity spills across time from its end to beginning, even perhaps in reverse, a gathering of the deathless and the truth of the living.

Al hambre de siete dias, no hay pan duro.

~ proverbio español

Under the commune

Victor Hugo - Wikiquote:
Socialism, or the Red Republic, is all one; for it would tear down the tricolour and set up the red flag. It would make penny pieces out of the Column Vendome. It would knock down the statue of Napoleon and raise up that of Marat in its stead. It would suppress the Académie, the Ecole Polytechnique, and the Legion of Honour. To the grand device Liberty, Equality, and Fraternity, it would add "Ou la mort." It would bring about a general bankruptcy. It would ruin the rich without enriching the poor. It would destroy labour, which gives to each one his bread. It would abolish property and family. It would march about with the heads of the proscribed on pikes, fill the prisons with the suspected, and empty them by massacres. It would convert France into the country of gloom. It would strangle liberty, stifle the arts, silence thought, and deny God. It would bring into action these two fatal machines, one of which never works without the other—the assignat press and the guillotine. In a word, it would do in cold blood what the men of 1793 did in fever, and after the grand horrors which our fathers saw, we should have the horrible in all that was low and small.

• Statement of May 1848, as quoted in Paris Under the Commune : Or, Seventy-Three Days of the Second Siege (1871) by John Leighton

-

Hero's Eye

You might list a dozen more steps before you finish the laundry and move on to the second chore on your original list. If you had to consider every small, low-level detail of every task in your day, you would probably never make it out of bed in the morning. Using a higher-level, more abstract list makes your day manageable. Abstraction makes complex tasks look simple.

Now that I have your attention I want to write-on-record. Let's look at this like a problem, just in case there are a few suicidal punk bitches still out there. Unfortunately, I only know what I know, and that often doesn't grasp with reality and certainly is at war with populism, I'll explain soon enough if that was a cliffhanger thought.

When I looked at the numbers of suicides in the military, I was stupefied, questioning my faith, if this is you, I don't mean to be condescending, frankly these are the people supposed to defend us, and for some reason they cannot save themselves, for matters of legality regarding libel, we can say their resolve has dissolved. The numbers of the dissolved are at record highs, for this I, a (lifelong) fiction hobbyist, considered that account of them had merely slipped into the field of espionage and taken new soluble identities, but for the numbers this couldn't be completely true. In my interests, anything possible, I even minimized it, considered 'it is only them and not me' and likely am in the hereafter. Theoretically, I could blame anything plausible and almost anything assumable, that state of nature to the nature of the state, it's a long list.

I like fiction, but we need an actual event to make the leap of faith, then we can continue. It is important to realize, there are people in our time that strap explosives to themselves and then explode, we call those people inbreds. They are following an unspoken code of honor held amongst old thieves and newborns, if you can't handle it yourself, don't ask for favors to get it done. What these people don't realize is soldiery and police are a piece of any family and the ones we have are just that, merely for a bigger family. Corruption is a poisonous specter, an enemy of mortality, like any other a view in depth at this is my point.

I've said before that enrollment practices could be improved if recruiters would play movies about demolition engineering and talk about the shooting range, they make a lot of promises and the shared understanding of threat goes largely unspoken. If killing isn't your business, then economics is your game, because it's a supply and demand game. There are people who commit military abandonment, I'd like you didn't do that, but being in a distinguished military you came from a successful country and you'll make some good babies and teach some good lessons, in some remote impoverished corner of the world. In my own ordinary way I briefly denied it was true, I imagined that it was a way for anarchists and speechifiers to discredit the service altogether, but then I realized they can stop enlistment. 

That only leaves one scenario that fiction embraces well but to be curt isn't easy and is written using universe. There has been a death in combat, enemy or ally, that has happened, and what we call grief floods our vision. That, coupled with all the formative concerns a fighter thinks, becomes a problem and instead of letting it go, they feel that the person is dead, that time should erase the dead. To remove them from ever existing, in regards to never becoming an enemy, to never adding a kill to a list, to never putting a human weapon so far from the west. It begins to pile, and when it shits is rains.


Often is the case that when the spies and spooks snap and commit treason, their minds are filled with thoughts of what they want, basically that they keep hoping for fantasies until they betray the groundwork. So I offer you this advice: don't imagine those who you have left or lost or laid to rest have something better, for they have gone from this place, imagine them in heaven (or hell) as if they had not made the bad choices that took them. All bad places are roaming prisons, and any place can get bad real fast. The trauma afterward supposedly can be terrible, and some can't make it on the outside either, your dreams should be what you miss the most, this is true for everyone. Imagine something that has no choice, when we dream it is no different, a beautiful lady can't resist you because you're broke, or a steamy dude dream, it's a different age.

In any case, don't imagine what you think someone else needs to make it through the night, or you might miss them and what prop item you gave them in your nightmare; think of what you want for yourself after this and think on it; I always think about the one food that I miss the most, that I'm going to eat when I get home.



~